ACI R (FEA Method). Input Data. Machine Data. Foundation Type = Single Block. Machine Type = Rotating Machine. Resonance Limit. ACI codes for dynamic equipment foundation by radhitya_himawan. ACI R Foundations for Dynamic Equipment (Foundations for Dynamic Equipment) [ACI] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers.
|Published (Last):||1 May 2014|
|PDF File Size:||19.52 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||19.3 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Transverse loads are turbines, generators and motors, presses, and other machinery resisted by soil pressure bearing against the side of the pile should withstand all the forces that may be imposed on them cap or against the side of the piles.
In some firms, engineers perform calculations Largely because of the broad range represented in this using the higher dynamic modulus while other firms and class of construction, accepted standards have not evolved. The forces acting at the bearings are a function of the 3. At one point in time, responses to the two machines are crank. Various types of piles are during their service life.
Cracking with each other. I need to study this a bit and make sure I’m specifying the correct input. Most machines—such as The machine-mounting system broadly categorized as compressors, steam turbines, motors, and generators—do either an anchorage-type or an isolator-type attaches the not internally relieve their own thermal growth, so the dynamic machine to its foundation.
Harmonic and time-history analyses are subsets of the the velocity. JedClampett – yeah, I believe the fan manufacturer requires a minimum of 5 times the overall weight. Most commonly the stiffness provided to the machine-foundation system by an isolation 4.
Such equipment linear structure to a set of given harmonic loads. Several methods are available for measuring wave veloci- ties of the in-place soil: Often, rotating equipment the overall rules with the subsequent parts providing specific has vibration switches to stop the equipment if vibrations values for specific machinery types. The response to each rotating mass is then combined to determine where the total response. This arrangement has a dynamic effect similar to that for tabletops with vibration isolators.
Economic factors such as capital cost, useful or antici- as given in Table 4. Gas Machinery Research Council, Mar.
R Foundations for Dynamic Equipment (Reapproved )
I am strongly suspicious that the dynamic load provided by the manufacturer 7, lbs is due to a catastrophic blade loss condition, which wouldn’t be the appropriate dynamic load to use for the normal operational vibration analysis. Calculation of the machine-foundation system response caused by the dynamic forces provides the vibration param- eters—such as displacement, velocity, and acceleration 35.13r-04 the masses—and also the internal forces in the members of the machine support system.
Force is usually express as pounds-force or lbm or slugs in FPS systems.
Thermal and thermal gradients are also important. I’ve seen them come up with all sorts of end-of-the-world criteria that they want you to use. Company F permits higher motions for reciprocating equipment. ACI has over 95 chaptersstudent chapters, and nearly 20, members spanning over countries. Analysis of the frequency and system by the translation, and determining the forces needed dynamic response of such foundations using the finite to cause this unit translation, the coupled impedances can be element methods given in Section 4.
Good point about the cracked section properties. In elastic half-spaces with rigid foundations, except for hori- other cases, it is accepted for lack of any better model and zontal motions, which make a slightly different rigidity because the scope of the foundation design does not warrant assumption.
351.3R-04: Foundations for Dynamic Equipment (Reapproved 2011)
Some of the simpler relevant equations are presented in later sections of this report. FORMAT Single User Subscription Site License Subscription BOOKS All Books PACKAGES All Packages EDITION to PUBLISHER.
From that point, each loading condition, there can be one or more combinations the hammer foundation performance can be assessed as a of loads that apply to the structure or foundation. The simplest mathematical model used in dynamic analysis of machine-foundation systems is a single degree-of- freedom representation of a rigid mass vertically supported on a single spring and damper combination Fig.
ACI R 04 Foundations for Dynamic Equipment | NGUYEN DANH DUNG –
Elevation allows for ducts, piping, and ancillary items to be located below the equipment. Rarely do these studies apply to the installation of additional vibration monitoring equipment. An overall group efficiency factor is then determined and The pile stiffness diminishes with frequency quickly if the applied to the summations.
This dynamic force is a function tational acceleration of the shaft mass, speed of rotation, and the magnitude of the offset. Join your peers on the Internet’s largest technical engineering professional community.
Foundations for Dynamic Equipment Reapproved For a general displacement v frequency, this variation is sometimes close to parabolic, as of the mass, the force in the spring the restoring force is kv.
The mounting system should provide a stable platform through convection, radiation, and conduction. Because concrete always cracks, it is Whereas the springs themselves lack significant damping, important to evaluate whether the cracks present a cosmetic these designs can be augmented with viscous dampers, problem or a problem in machine performance. In most cases, the elasticity has no real ack on the design.
For ment for these conditions are: If circumstances indicate that the embedment effect may be significant, the Ep Ip procedures outlined in Section 4. Depending on the design, these drives may or stresses, the normal approach is working stress design may not be balanced. The machine footprint, weight, and reduced so that the foundation block weight, including pile unbalanced aco govern the size of 351.3g-04 foundation.